Volume 76 Issue 3 1992 Article Hearsay Logic Peter Tillers David Schum View Full Article In This Issue Post-Modern Hearsay Reform: The Importance of Complexity Understanding Responses to Hearsay: An Extension of the Comparative Analysis Stuggling to Stop the Flood of Unreliable Expert Testimony The Constitutionalization of Hearsay: The Extent to Which the Fifth and Sixth Amendments Permit or Require the Liberalization of the Hearsay Rules Constitutional Dimensions of Hearsay Reform: Toward a Three-Dimensional Confrontation Clause The Hearsay Rule at Work: Has It Been Abolished De Facto by Judicial Decision The Deconstitutionalization of the Confrontation Clause: A Proposal for a Prosecutorial Restraint Model Jurors' Perceptions of Eyewitness and Hearsay Evidence Of Hearsay and Its Analogues The Hearsay Rule at Work: Has It Been Abolished De Facto by Judicial Discretion Juror Decision Making and the Evaluation of Hearsay Evidence Hearsay Logic The Right to Confrontation: Not a Mere Restraint on Government Toward a Partial Economic, Game-Theoretic Analysis of Hearsay Researching the Hearsay Rule: Emerging Findings, General Issues, and Future Directions The New Wave of Hearsay Reform Scholarship The Evolution of the Hearsay Rule to a Rule of Admission Experts as Hearsay Conduits: Confrontation Abuses in Opinion Testimony