Minnesota Law Review

Vol. 76: Iss. 3, 1992

Post-Modern Hearsay Reform: The Importance of Complexity

Understanding Responses to Hearsay: An Extension of the Comparative Analysis

Stuggling to Stop the Flood of Unreliable Expert Testimony

The Constitutionalization of Hearsay: The Extent to Which the Fifth and Sixth Amendments Permit or Require the Liberalization of the Hearsay Rules

Constitutional Dimensions of Hearsay Reform: Toward a Three-Dimensional Confrontation Clause

The Hearsay Rule at Work: Has It Been Abolished De Facto by Judicial Decision

The Deconstitutionalization of the Confrontation Clause: A Proposal for a Prosecutorial Restraint Model

Jurors' Perceptions of Eyewitness and Hearsay Evidence

Of Hearsay and Its Analogues

The Hearsay Rule at Work: Has It Been Abolished De Facto by Judicial Discretion

Juror Decision Making and the Evaluation of Hearsay Evidence

Hearsay Logic

The Right to Confrontation: Not a Mere Restraint on Government

Toward a Partial Economic, Game-Theoretic Analysis of Hearsay

Researching the Hearsay Rule: Emerging Findings, General Issues, and Future Directions

The New Wave of Hearsay Reform Scholarship

The Evolution of the Hearsay Rule to a Rule of Admission

Experts as Hearsay Conduits: Confrontation Abuses in Opinion Testimony

Archives
- Subscriptions
Headnotes
- Submissions
De Novo
About
Banquet
Symposium
- Symposia Archive
  - 2024-25 Symposium
Submissions