Minnesota Law Review

Volume 40

Vol. 40: Iss. 1

Some Lawyers' Problems in Grievance Arbitration

The Bill of Rights, Due Process, and Federalism in India

Purchaser's Duty to Disclose under Securities and Exchange Commission Rule X-10B-5

Vol. 40: Iss. 2

Current Municipal Bond Procedures in Minnesota

Blackstone and Joseph Story--Their Influence on the Development of Criminal Law in America

Foreign Economic Policy and the Antitrust Laws

Minnesota Corrupt Practices Act: A Critique of the Fixed Campaign Expenditure Limitations

Vol. 40: Iss. 3

The Social Scientist as an Expert Witness

Why Neglect Comparative Taxation

Jurisdiction over Immovables: The Little Case Revisited after Sixty Years

Sovereign Immunity of the States: The Doctrine and Some of Its Recent Developments

Vol. 40: Iss. 4

Presumptions

The Uniform Rules of Evidence: A Defendant's View

Judicial Notice

Evidentiary Privileges

Minnesota and the Uniform Rules of Evidence

Expert and Other Opinion Testimony

The Hearsay Rule and Its Exceptions

The Uniform Rules of Evidence: A Plaintiff's View

The Privilege Argument--How It Has Fared in Constitutional Law

Vol. 40: Iss. 5

The Status of Political Party Organization in Minnesota Law

Congressional Investigation of Newspapermen, Authors, and Others in the Opinion Field--Its Legality under the First Amendment

Tax Treatment of Losses on Securities Acquired in the Normal Course of Business

Silence as Incrimination in Federal Courts

Vol. 40: Iss. 6

A Primer of Practical Evidence

Nineteenth Century Judicial Thought Concerning Church-State Relations

Municipal Inducements to Private Industry

Evidence of Similar Transactions in Sex Crime Prosecutions: A New Trend toward Liberal Admissibility

Vol. 40: Iss. 7

Tort Liability of Governmental Units

The Proposed Amendment of the Judiciary Article of the Minnesota Constitution

The Presence of a Motive to Misrepresent as Justification for Excluding Exculpatory Declarations of Mental Condition

The Resurgence of the Exclusive Territorial Distributorship as an Antitrust Problem