Skip to main content
Go to the U of M home page
  • One Stop
  • MyU

Constitutional Commentary

Menu
  • Archives
  • About
  • First Look
  • Submissions
  • Subscriptions

Vol. 37: Iss. 2, 2022

A Positivist, Baseball-Centric Critique of Originalism

Unprecedented Precedent: The Case Against Unreasoned "Shadow Docket" Precedent

The Battle Over Rights is the Problem but Judges are not the Solution

Law Between Optimality and Normativity

The Reign of Constitutional Positivism: Revolution Reconceived in the New Constitutional Age

Four Privacy Stories and Two Hard Cases

"Originalist" Justices and the Myth That Article III "Cases" Always Require Adversarial Disputes

Constitutional Commentary
University of Minnesota Law School
229 19th Ave. South
Minneapolis, MN 55455

[email protected]

Group Footer Menu

  • Archives

Footer Menus

  • Law Journals
  • Minnesota Law Review
  • Minnesota Journal of Law & Inequality
  • Minnesota Journal of International Law
  • Minnesota Journal of Law, Science and Technology
  • Constitutional Commentary
  • University of Minnesota Law School
  • UMN Publishing Services
  • Log In

For Students, Faculty, and Staff

  • One Stop
  • MyU
©2026 Regents of the University of Minnesota. All rights reserved. The University of Minnesota is an equal opportunity educator and employer. Privacy Statement Report Web Accessibility Issues
  • Archives
    • Subscriptions
  • Headnotes
    • Submissions
  • De Novo
  • About
    • Alumni
    • Current Masthead
    • Membership
  • Banquet
  • Symposium
    • Symposia Archive
      • 2024-25 Symposium
  • Submissions