Skip to main content
Go to the U of M home page
  • One Stop
  • MyU

Constitutional Commentary

Menu
  • Archives
  • About
  • First Look
  • Submissions
  • Subscriptions

Vol. 31: Iss. 3, 2014

Silent Concurrences

Rethinking Judicial Supremacy

On Jim Fleming’s Anti-Originalism

The Document and the Drama

Intelligent or Unintelligent Fidelity?

Originalism’s Curiously Triumphant Death: The Interpenetration of Aspirationalism and Historicism in U.S. Constitutional Development

Reading DeBoer and Obergefell Through the “Moral Readings Versus Originalisms” Debate: from Constitutional “Empty Cupboards” to Evolving Understandings

Fidelity to the Best Version of Ourselves

Fidelity to Our Imperfect Constitution: A Response to Six Views

Constitutional Commentary
University of Minnesota Law School
229 19th Ave. South
Minneapolis, MN 55455

[email protected]

Group Footer Menu

  • Archives

Footer Menus

  • Law Journals
  • Minnesota Law Review
  • Minnesota Journal of Law & Inequality
  • Minnesota Journal of International Law
  • Minnesota Journal of Law, Science and Technology
  • Constitutional Commentary
  • University of Minnesota Law School
  • UMN Publishing Services
  • Log In

For Students, Faculty, and Staff

  • One Stop
  • MyU
©2026 Regents of the University of Minnesota. All rights reserved. The University of Minnesota is an equal opportunity educator and employer. Privacy Statement Report Web Accessibility Issues
  • Archives
    • Subscriptions
  • Headnotes
    • Submissions
  • De Novo
  • About
    • Alumni
    • Current Masthead
    • Membership
  • Banquet
  • Symposium
    • Symposia Archive
      • 2024-25 Symposium
  • Submissions