Skip to main content
Go to the U of M home page
  • One Stop
  • MyU

Constitutional Commentary

Menu
  • Archives
  • About
  • First Look
  • Submissions
  • Subscriptions

Vol. 27: Iss. 2, 2010

A Thinker-Based Approach to Freedom of Speech

Autonomy and Free Speech

Speech Restrictions that Don't Much Affect the Autonomy of Speakers

Court-Packing and the Child Labor Amendment

Free Speech and Political Legitimacy: A Response to Ed Baker

Seana Shiffrin's Thinker-Based Theory of Free Speech: Elegant and Insightful, But Will It Work in Practice?

There Is No First Amendment Overbreadth (But There Are Vague First Amendment Doctrines); Prior Restrains Aren't "Prior"; and "As Applied" Challenges Seek Judicial Statutory Amendments

Seana Shiffrin's Thinker-Based Freedom of Speech: A Response

Reply to Critics

Freedom of Speech and Two Types of Autonomy

Free Speech and Autonomy: Thinkers, Storytellers, and a Systematic Approach to Speech

Comment on Baker's Autonomy and Free Speech

Comment on Shiffrin's Thinker-Based Approach to Freedom of Speech

Individual Autonomy and Free Speech: Editor's Note

Constitutionalism in the United Kingdom

Constitutional Commentary
University of Minnesota Law School
229 19th Ave. South
Minneapolis, MN 55455

[email protected]

Group Footer Menu

  • Archives

Footer Menus

  • Law Journals
  • Minnesota Law Review
  • Minnesota Journal of Law & Inequality
  • Minnesota Journal of International Law
  • Minnesota Journal of Law, Science and Technology
  • Constitutional Commentary
  • University of Minnesota Law School
  • UMN Publishing Services
  • Log In

For Students, Faculty, and Staff

  • One Stop
  • MyU
©2026 Regents of the University of Minnesota. All rights reserved. The University of Minnesota is an equal opportunity educator and employer. Privacy Statement Report Web Accessibility Issues
  • Archives
  • Lex Specialis
  • MJIL Blog
  • 2026 Symposium
  • About
    • Contact
    • Executive Board
  • Submissions