Skip to main content
Go to the U of M home page
  • One Stop
  • MyU

Constitutional Commentary

Menu
  • Archives
  • About
  • First Look
  • Submissions
  • Subscriptions

Vol. 27: Iss. 1, 2010

The Interpretation/Construction Distinction in Constitutional Law: Annual Meeting of the AALS Section on Constitutional Law: Introduction

Why Jack Balkin Is Disgusting

The Supreme Court's Declining Plenary Docket: A Membership-Based Explanation

Constructing the Constitutional Canon: The Metonymic Evolution of Federalist 10

Specifying Constitutional Rights

Constructing a New American Constitution

Telepathic Law

The Constitutional Interpretation/Construction Distinction: A Useful Fiction

The Interpretation-Construction Distinction

An Almost Archeological Dig: Finding a Surprisingly Rich Early Understanding of Substantive Due Process

The Vanity of Dogmatizing

Constitutional Constructions and Constitutional Decision Rules: Thoughts on the Carving of Implementation Space

Reply to Koppelman: Originalism and the (Merely) Human Constitution

Constitutional Commentary
University of Minnesota Law School
229 19th Ave. South
Minneapolis, MN 55455

[email protected]

Group Footer Menu

  • Archives

Footer Menus

  • Law Journals
  • Minnesota Law Review
  • Minnesota Journal of Law & Inequality
  • Minnesota Journal of International Law
  • Minnesota Journal of Law, Science and Technology
  • Constitutional Commentary
  • University of Minnesota Law School
  • UMN Publishing Services
  • Log In

For Students, Faculty, and Staff

  • One Stop
  • MyU
©2026 Regents of the University of Minnesota. All rights reserved. The University of Minnesota is an equal opportunity educator and employer. Privacy Statement Report Web Accessibility Issues
  • Archives
    • Subscriptions
  • Headnotes
    • Submissions
  • De Novo
  • About
    • Alumni
    • Current Masthead
    • Membership
  • Banquet
  • Symposium
    • Symposia Archive
      • 2024-25 Symposium
  • Submissions