Edward K. Cheng — Articles

Completing the Quantum of Evidence: A Response to Daniel Capra and Liesa Richter’s Evidentiary Irony and the Incomplete Rule of Completeness

Minnesota Law Review, Vol. 105: Iss. 2

In Evidentiary Irony and the Incomplete Rule of Completeness, Daniel Capra and Liesa Richter propose an amendment to Federal Rule of Evidence 106, the “rule of completeness,” that formally recognizes the Rule’s trumping power over objections to hearsay. In this...

Changing Scientific Evidence

Minnesota Law Review, Vol. 88: Iss. 2